Sociotechnical Plan for Self Governance in Smart Cities
Introduction
A smart city uses communication and information
technologies in improving operational efficiency, sharing information with
citizens, and providing high-quality government services (Shin, 2015). It
comprises interconnected objects and devices using wireless technology in
transmitting data. Smart cities use cloud-based IoT systems to receive, analyze
and manage real-time data to ensure excellent decisions are made for their
citizens. The citizens of these smart cities use their smartphones, smart
homes, and cars to engage their ecosystems and pair their data with city
infrastructure and services to enhance sustainability while minimizing costs. A
smart city is a good example of a sociotechnical system because it facilitates
the collaboration of people with technology to improve human life. This
sociotechnical plan focuses on enabling citizens of smart cities to use
technology to manage city resources and assets. These citizens will no longer
have to rely on their leaders to make decisions; they will directly participate
in shaping their future.
Scope
The internet of things (IoT) comprises
physical objects with software, processing power, and sensors that facilitate
data exchange through the internet. It leads to the creation of an intelligent
ecosystem comprised of machines used to integrate and improve human life.
Technological
advancements have led to the slow merging of the physical and digital worlds.
They have also led to advancements in embedded systems, sensor networks,
communication abilities, and computing power (Olushola, 2019). Artificial intelligence, virtual
reality, and machine learning are very important in smart cities.
The
internet is a major driving force for smart cities. The internet enhances
efficiency by resolving environmental issues, traffic and managing smart city
technologies. The internet also collects multiple forms of media from multiple
machines to collect information from smart city citizens.
The
multiple interconnected devices in smart cities lead to cybersecurity concerns.
Cybercriminals can target these devices to compromise smart city systems. When malware
compromises a smart city, its entire system can be quickly taken down. Since
smart cities allocate municipal services to smart systems, cybercriminals can
compromise essential services such as water, electricity, and traffic
management (Hua, 2017). Malicious cybercriminals can also compromise smart city
systems to manipulate opinion polls and statistics used for governance.
Purpose
Most
cities in the world are governed by corrupt or poor leadership. Poor governance
can significantly compromise the development of major cities. Smart city
systems can be used to make smart data-driven decisions. These cities can be
used to collect data on crime rates, transportation systems, waste management,
graduation rates, and environmental pollution to make reliable decisions. They
can also conduct opinion polls to allow citizens to make choices that directly
affect their future. We shall no longer have to deal with leadership but rather
self-governance. Citizens will govern themselves through smart city intelligent
machines that collect data used to make and evaluate policies, oversee city
operations, allocate resources, ensure integrity and transparency of city
resources and protect the interests of the citizens. These machines will
replace city leaders with effective intelligent machines.
References
Hua, T. (2017). Tackling cyber crimes in
smart cities. https://www.leekuanyewworldcityprize.gov.sg/resources/features/tackling-cyber-crimes-smart-cities/
Olushola, O. B. (2019). Factors affecting IoT
adoption. IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering (IOSR-JCE) Volume, 21,
19-24. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bayo-Olushola-Omoyiola/publication/337657446_Factors_affecting_IoT_adoption/links/5e4e5796458515072dabbdec/Factors-affecting-IoT-adoption.pdf
Shin, D. H., Kim, S., Hong, Y., Chung, K.,
& Jeong, J. (2015). A sociotechnical framework for internet-of-things
design. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/146323
Comments
Post a Comment